Home > Measurement Resources > Performance Measurement in the News >

Measuring Training's Effectiveness and Impact

Dr. John Sullivan

Head and Professor of Human Resource Management
College of Business, San Francisco State University

Training can be measured in a variety of ways. The groupings below (Items I-V) are listed in increasing order of business value.

I - Prior to training

  • The number of people that say they need it during the needs assessment process.

  • The number of people that sign up for it.

II - At the end of training

  • The number of people that attend the session.

  • The number of people that paid to attend the session.

  • Customer satisfaction (attendees) at end of training.

  • Customer satisfaction at end of training when customers know the actual costs of the training.

  • A measurable change in knowledge or skill at end of training.

  • Ability to solve a "mock" problem at end of training.

  • Willingness to try or intent to use the skill/ knowledge at end of training.

III - Delayed impact (non-job)

  • Customer satisfaction at X weeks after the end of training.

  • Customer satisfaction at X weeks after the training when customers know the actual costs of the training.

  • Retention of Knowledge at X weeks after the end of training.

  • Ability to solve a "mock" problem at X weeks after end of training.

  • Willingness to try (or intent to use) the skill/ knowledge at X weeks after the end of the training.

IV - On the job behavior change

  • Trained individuals that self-report that they changed their behavior / used the skill or knowledge on the job after the training (within X months).

  • Trained individuals who's managers report that they changed their behavior / used the skill or knowledge on the job after the training (within X months).

  • Trained individuals that actually are observed to change their behavior / use the skill or knowledge on the job after the training (within X months).

V - On the job performance change

  • Trained individuals that self-report that their actual job performance changed as a result of their changed behavior / skill (within X months).

  • Trained individuals who's manager's report that their actual job performance changed as a result of their changed behavior / skill (within X months).

  • Trained individuals who's manager's report that their job performance changed (as a result of their changed behavior / skill) either through improved performance appraisal scores or specific notations about the training on the performance appraisal form (within X months).

  • Trained individuals that have observable / measurable (improved sales, quality, speed etc.) improvement in their actual job performance as a result of their changed behavior / skill (within X months).

  • The performance of employees that are managed by (or are part of the same team with) individuals that went through the training.

  • Departmental performance in departments with X % of employees that went through training ROI (Cost/Benefit ratio) of return on training dollar spent (compared to our competition, last year, other offered training, preset goals etc.).

Other measures

  • CEO / Top management knowledge of / approval of / or satisfaction with the training program.

  • Rank of training seminar in forced ranking by managers of what factors (among miscellaneous staff functions) contributed most to productivity/ profitability improvement.

  • Number (or %) of referrals to the training by those who have previously attended the training.

  • Additional number of people who were trained (cross-trained) by those who have previously attended the training. And their change in skill/ behavior/ performance.

  • Popularity (attendance or ranking) of the program compared to others (for voluntary training programs).
Copyright © April 1998 by Dr. John Sullivan
Head and Professor of Human Resource Management
College of Business, San Francisco State University
top of page